RESULTS: The First Annual Great Christmas Write-a-thon

When last you’d heard an update about the progress of the Great Christmas Write-a-thon I was, hmmm, underperforming.

I will confess that the plan (getting three stories done over those two weeks) didn’t go quite as I’d hoped. I ended up getting exactly ONE story completed in that time–SHIPBREAKER. The story ended up being far more difficult to get working than I’d anticipated, so a lot of my time was eaten up trying to work through various character issues, plot problems, etc.

My estimate of its ultimate length was around 7500 words, and that it might need some trimming afterward to get it under that threshold (7500 words seems to be where editors stop seeing ‘short story’ and start seeing ‘novella’, and that can create problems for selling to markets–in this case an anthology whose upper-limit is 10 000 words).

However, SHIPBREAKER ended up being 9562 words long, and by printer’s rule that makes it a whopping 10 000 words long (!) Obviously WAY longer than I expected. Here’s how the per day breakdown went:

Dec 19: 26 (yeah, yeah, I know. Shut up)

Dec 20: 208

Dec 21: 927

Dec 22: 534

Dec 23: 633

Dec 24: 791

Dec 25: 476 (fairly respectable, I think, for it being Christmas Day, and me being all logey with turkey and cabbage rolls)

Dec 26: 466

Dec 27: 183 (hmm…I think the logey caught up with me…)

Dec 28: 1631 (booyah!)

Dec 29: 1431 (booyah, uhh, again! Dammit…)

Total Words Written: 7306

Average Daily Total Word Count: 664

So, I’ve sent it off to some readers and received their comments back. While all have offered very useful suggestions that I’ll use during my revisions, crazily enough a couple want me to make a novel out of the thing. Errp! That’s something to maybe consider down the road (I’d not really imagined writing a fantasy novel–I tend to do mostly SF) but my plan now is to finish another story for another anthology first and then turn to revising SHIPBREAKER by the end of February for submission.

I know I need to cut this one down from 10 000. Part of that will be easy–I suffer from a lot of first-draft-itis, which means that in the rush to get something on paper (err, screen) there are parts which tend to flabbiness, or repetitiveness, or repetitiveness, just as a result of me telling myself the story the first time. Later, I go back and produce what my favorite professor used to call “lean, sinewy prose” (that’s what he asked for in our essays, not what he ever said about my writing. I did five years of university and have two degrees, and can honestly say that while it taught me much about how to think and read critically, construct arguments, muster proofs, etc. I didn’t learn how to express my ideas clearly and/or artfully until I started writing fiction every day. So there you go–want to learn how to write? Then start writing.)

What gives me hope that I can actually wrangle this story–that I can break SHIPBREAKER, if you will–is that with ‘Borrowed Time’ I had to trim from 7500 words to 5000. I managed to do it, the story was stronger as a result (a little more breathless, I think), and the tale sold to the Under Cover of Darkness anthology.

Wish me luck.

– S.

Back From the Outer Reaches

Okay, okay. So it’s been a while since last I posted.

More than a while.

But I’ve been prodded by a number of people to get back at it. And of these a special thanks to my friend Darrell, who has always been good at keeping my feet to the fire when it comes to creative endeavors.

So expect a bunch of posts today to update things and then hopefully more frequent posts again after that.

TTFN

– S.

Ad Astra Panels

More news on the panel front. According to the latest Ad Astra e-mail update, I’m on (count ’em) THREE panels, not simply the one that I’d thought.

Cool.

Tentatively, the panels (and participants) are:

* Writing for Anthologies vs. Writing for Magazines (Jana Paniccia, Stephen Kotowych, Scott Mackay, Mike Rimar)

* Writers who Edit, Writers who work in Publishing (Jana Paniccia, Stephen Kotowych)

* Writers of the Future Anthology and Contest (Mike Rimar, Robert J. Sawyer, Stephen Kotowych, Tony Pi)

There are lots of panels that I might LIKE to participate in, however, as I’ll have only one story in print by then and only two more on the way I don’t want to overstep my actual expertise and/or importance.

It’s quite a kick to be on panels with Jana Paniccia and Robert J. Sawyer. Jana is co-editor of Under Cover of Darkness, the anthology that includes my first published work of fiction, ‘Borrowed Time’. And Rob is kind of my SF guru–everything I know about writing SF I stole from him 🙂

PLUS, there will be a theme game run throughout the weekend with clues involving UNDER COVER OF DARKNESS. I’m promised this will be uber-cool, but the exact details remain a mystery to even the contributors (or, at least, even to me). The conclusion of the game will coincide with the scheduled book launch with the authors at noon on the Sunday of Ad Astra.

There look to be a LOT of great panels this year. I can’t wait. There are lots I hope to attend–we’ll see how the schedule works out.

Okay–less blog, more fiction.

– S.

Christmas Write-a-thon Word Count: Wednesday

It goeth not well…

Wednesday’s word count: 208

Hmmm… In my defense, I did realize that I needed to make a major change in the plot to complicate things and that ate up a lot of time. Plus I’m competing for computer time with two brothers and a father who feel that futzing with Guitar Pro, WarCraft III, and Joytube’s Wordy are more important than helping me meet my daily word count.

Some Christmas spirit, eh? 🙂

– S.

PS: I have no one to blame but myself for my dad’s addiction to Wordy. It’s like Scrabble crack and I was his pusher. Alas.

The Great Christmas Write-a-thon

Well, I’ve arrived safely at my parents’ place on Georgian Bay for an extended two-week Christmas break (the longest extended period off I’ve had, I realized, since I finished my Masters degree in late 2002–yikes!)

And lest you think I plan merely to watch Spike TV’s Star Trek: Voyager and James Bond marathons and drink eggnog until nutmeg oozes from my pores (which is a sorely tempting option for these two weeks, mind you) I plan instead the First Annual Great Christmas Write-a-thon.

As you may know (or more likely not know, and possibly not care) I tend to do much of my writing during lunch hours Monday through Friday. We don’t have a lunch room at the Press, so people just disappear behind closed office doors for an hour or so each day. Rob Sawyer’s advice once upon a time that I use that lunch hour to do something more productive than surf Wikipedia made a lot of sense. So I tend to reread what I wrote the day before, maybe edit a bit, and then bang out the new stuff.

Having done this going on four years now, I’ve got what creative muscles I possess prepared for an all-out one-hour sprint each weekday. I can pretty reliably get 500 words or so in an hour if I know where I’m headed (which isn’t always).

So given that I have two weeks off (and that there ain’t a lot doin’ up here) I’ve decided that I’ll set the bar a bit higher over my Christmas holidays. I’m thinking that I’ll try for 1000 words a day for the next fourteen days and really get some stuff done. Given that my short stories tend to average between 5000 and 7500 words, I could get almost three stories completed.

However, I’m hopeful I might get more than that done.

The first project I’ll be finishing up will be a story called ‘Shipbreaker’, for which I already have about 2500 words done. Then, I will be revising for submission a story called ‘Gagiid’ (of which I’m actually exceptionally proud–partly because it’s the first story of mine that involves no dialog whatsoever). After that, I’d like to work on another partly-written story (1300 words) tentatively called ‘Wordhord’, inspired by my friend and former roommate Patrick, one of the world’s future foremost Anglo-Saxonists.

I’d like to have ‘Shipbreaker’ done not later than Saturday 23 December. ‘Gagiid’ will likely not take longer than one day to revise, so that’s Sunday 24 December (Christmas Eve!) I can start in on ‘Wordhord’ on Christmas Day and have it done not later than Saturday 30 December. That’s assuming that each story ends up being around 7500 words. They may not, meaning I could get them done and start in on a third new story before heading back to Toronto for New Year’s.

We’ll see. I’ll try and post each day’s word count. Wish me luck!

– S.

Amazon.com Promo Copy for UNDER COVER OF DARKNESS

Was poking around Amazon.com today (well, the .ca version, but they’re essentially the same) looking for the release date of Under Cover of Darkness (it’s 6 February 2007, by the by) and I noticed the promotional copy that’s up for the book:

“FOURTEEN ORIGINAL SHORT STORIES OF SECRET AGENTS AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE LEFT THEIR MARK ON TIME AND SPACE…

From the true role of the Freemasons to Chronographers who steal pieces of time to an assassin hired by a group that reweaves the threads of history, here are fourteen imaginative tales of time and space and realms beyond our own-all watched over, preserved, or changed by those who work covertly under cover of darkness. “

That’s my story–the bit I put in bold–mentioned on AMAZON.COM! There’s also mention of my story on the back jacket copy. Now, that publisher’s promo copy on Amazon will likely be replaced eventually with a quote from Bookseller, or Publishers Weekely, or Kirkus, or Locus, etc. But for now, having my story mentioned like that–hightlighted in the publisher’s promotional material–is, well, pretty cool.

From what I’ve heard about the other stories in the collection, I think people will be really pleased with the book. I for one can’t wait to read all the other stories.

– S.

Self-Doubt in Writing

Since I began writing again a few years ago, I’ve noticed a definite psychological pattern in ‘Steve the Writer’.

It struck me again this weekend as I was frantically trying to finish a story that’s due for submission by Friday (I’m still waiting to hear back from the volume editor whether a postmark of Dec. 15 is sufficient, or whether it actually needs to be in Delaware by Friday…)

The stages go like this:

1) Idea and Inspiration
– there is a rush of excitement as something new comes to me from the blue or something I read/see/hear/smell, etc. sparks my imagination and a story idea is born. I’ll usually open a new file and make some notes or an outline of the basic idea, and perhaps even a story if I have one

2) Excitement and Anticipation
– I’m eager to get started on the ‘New Idea’ but it’s rare that I can jump right in. I usually have at least one other story on the go at the time and if I started something new every time a new idea hit, well, I’d never get anything done. So I put it away for a while until I can get to it.

3) Writing Begins
– I almost always have an ending before I begin, many times I’ll have a beginning. The middle, for the most part, is a mystery. I tend to write very much out of order: a scene may pop in to my head that happens somewhere in the middle, or maybe more toward the end, and I’ll start writing that and see where it takes me. Sometimes these work great and stay in, sometimes they’re heavily adapted for the final version, other times they’re written, considered, and then abandoned.

4) Frustration and Despair
– This is the stage I found myself in yesterday afternoon around the day’s 750-word mark. It tends to come in the really hard slogging of the middle story, where there’s explaining to be done, plot to moved along, and character to be developed, and sometimes when its not entirely clear whether these scenes work in the larger context of the story. I tend to get frustrated with the slow-going of the connective bits I need to write to put together the longer sequences that come to me in flashes and which aren’t a struggle to write at all. I start to get bored with writing, then I worry that I’m bored because what I’m writing is boring, and then I fear that if the AUTHOR is bored then the reader will be REALLY bored…

Then I bang my head on the keyboard repeatedly and declare “Oh, I’ll never get this right! Never, never, never!” over and over. A lot like Don Music, in fact.

I almost always need to stop for the rest of the day, do something else to clear my mind, drink heavily, etc.

5) Calming Down
– The next day I’ll re-read what I wrote and despaired over the day before and almost always find that it’s not nearly as bad as I thought. Sometimes it’s pretty good and I can press on; other times I see what I can change and where I can fix it and that starts the ball rolling again. I always have in the back of my mind the thought that “If this is really slow to write, maybe it’s slowing down the story and you can just move to the next bit…” And I do.

6) Critical Mass and Renewed Enthusiasm
– After X number of random scenes are linked together by Y number of connective bits that were like pulled teeth to write, I find the story suddenly takes a rough shape and a kind of critical mass is reached. The rush I felt near the beginning of the story returns–but as the rush of a finish line in sight! I’ve been known to pound out 2500 words in a few hours once I reach this tipping point (an overused phrase, but appropriate here as it can feel like whooshing down a slope no longer under my own power, just riding the story out to its logical conclusion). I know that 2500 isn’t much by comparison to what, say, a professional novelist would aim to complete in a day, but when my stories tend to range between 5000 and 7500 words it’s a sizable chunk. The other benefit is that, even if I don’t manage to finish the whole thing at this point, I know at last where the story is headed and how it gets there, so it’s easy to jump back in and renew the drive to the end.

7) The Finished Draft
– Finishing off a draft is a great feeling. I might tinker a little with it first, but I send it out to my first readers as soon as I can manage. Then I might bask in the glow of the accomplishment for the rest of the day–I tend to feel like a million bucks afterwards, but I also need to clear my head of one imaginary world so I can be ready to dive into another new one the day. When it comes back from my readers I’ll revise in light of their comments and then start sending the manuscript out to markets.

And the funny thing is, at the end of it all, I don’t really remember the anguish of Stage 4, can convince myself (if only for a little while) that the next story I write will come much easier, and the cycle repeats again and again and again…

It wouldn’t surprise me to hear that this, or a similar pattern, happens in many (if not most) authors. I heard someone say once that writers were simultaneously the most arrogant and insecure people: they feel that they have something to say that people should read and care about, but are so consumed with self-doubt they fear no one will and that they will be ridiculed for even having tried.

Perhaps this is something that I can train myself out of, but I doubt it. I think this is the peculiar affliction that is mine to embrace. I keep going through the sequence, you’ll note, even though I should know better by now. I must enjoy the suffering on some level. Or maybe the high at the end is enough to sustain my addiction.

But I’ve also noted that the above doesn’t apply equally to other creative aspects of my life. I’ve played guitar since I was 15 and even have a 4-track recorder that I mess around with, but I mostly do covers and weirdness and not original rock or pop songs of my own. When I do, I undergo the first four stages, including the same fugue-like series of self-doubt and frustrations, but when I later go back and listen to what I’ve done odds are good that I’m never happy with it or see a way to fix it/make it better the way I do with my writing.

This leads me to believe I was meant to be a writer and not a rock star…which is too bad, in some ways, because I really like wearing leather pants. You can do that as a rocker, not so much as a writer (well, not without ‘talk’ anyway…)


– S.

New Submission

Sent off CITIUS, ALTIUS, FORTIUS–a 5000-word hard-ish SF story–to Tesseracts Eleven today, by both post and e-mail, as per the submission requirements.

The Tesseract series of books has been around since 1985, garnering an impressive list of contributors, award wins and nominations (especially among the Prix Aurora Awards), and editors over the years. This year’s dynamic editorial duo are Cory Doctorow and Holly Phillips.

According to the website, I should have their decision by late May 2007.

– S.

1st-2nd-3rd Quarter Winners Announced

Okay, so I’m a little late to notice this post from the Writers of the Future blog, but still, it’s pretty cool to see my name in pixels.

Is that the new dream, in our Internet Age, do you think? Once people wanted to see their name in lights, now do they long to see their name in pixels? Or is the internet just too democratic that way–if anybody can MySpace then why are you special for being on the internet?

Maybe we need gatekeepers–official sites, contests, editors, etc.–to act as a filter for the onslaught of the internet, for an age where no one is special because everyone is because no one is.

Maybe the new yearning is to be on reality TV. If that’s the case, they can keep it.

– S.